The Second Amendment to the
United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that reads:
A well-regulated Militia,
being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to
keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
It was adopted on December
15, 1791, along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. When our forefathers
included this clause, its purpose was to make sure that the federal government could
not disarm state militias, in other words to keep government in the hands of
the people.
Then in 1792, the Congress
enacted the Militia Acts of 1792 allowing "free able-bodied white male
citizen" into the militia and required such citizens to procure "a
good musket or firelock, a sufficient bayonet and belt, two spare flints, and a
knapsack, a pouch with a box therein to contain not less than twenty-four
cartridges, suited to the bore of his musket or firelock, each cartridge to
contain a proper quantity of powder and ball;..."
In the 2008, the Supreme
Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual’s right to own a
gun for
personal use, unconnected with service in a militia. It also
specifically stated that individuals have the right to keep a loaded gun at
home for self-defense. This is a
deviation from the intentions of the Second Amendment.
Fast forward to 2012. Our country and the world just saw, once
again, that there will be mass shootings again and again, and we are not doing
enough to stop it from happening.
Why? Let’s start with
assault weapons. Many of these
sprees were carried out with assault weapons. The NRA has a lot of influence, power, and money and they
are against the Assault Weapon Ban. The NRA focuses on a citizen’s right to
defend oneself. Do they
believe that every household should have an assault weapon for protection? Banning assault weapons does not
infringe on our Second Amendment rights. Why can’t the NRA work with the legislators and use its
power and influence to make some needed changes for everyone’s safety? Seriouly NRA, assault weapons are ok?
It goes without saying that
James Holmes, a PhD student and the shooter in the recent Aurora spree, is
insane, as are all the other shooters in our string of mass murders. But what are also insane are our gun
laws. Why can’t we make that
connection? This should
not be a partisan issue.
We need to take a long hard look at our gun laws and update them to the
times we live in, to keep us safer.
Republicans can be good republicans and support gun control laws.
The United States is one of
the few developed countries that allow firearms in the hands of the
public. Astoundingly, about 45% of
American households have guns, and these are only the registered gun owners
that we know about.
Looking at some other
countries, Canadian gun laws are among the toughest in the world, especially
since the Firearms Act of 1995 has come into full effect. The UK also has some
of the toughest gun control laws in the world. If you want to own a gun, you
need to spend hours filling in paperwork and proving to police officers that
you are not a danger to society, whereas in the United States, you can declare
that it is your ‘constitutional right to bear arms’. As a matter of fact,
according to research from 2011, only South Africa, Colombia, El Salvador,
Jamaica, Honduras, Guatemala, Swaziland, Brazil, Panama, Estonia, and Mexico
had more fire-arm related deaths than the US. These
include homicide, suicide, and unintentional deaths. I am not happy that our country is grouped up there with
these countries in regard to their gun violence.
Almost anyone in the US can
buy a gun or an assault weapon, ammunition, and go on a shooting spree. The NRA
has fought tooth and nail not to allow proper thorough background checks on
people wanting to buy a gun.
Why? It certainly could not
hurt. Here is another suggestion
for the NRA – support thorough background checks. Even if there is no indication or record of this person
being crazy…yet...we allow the opportunity to provide him the means to do a
crazy thing, hurting and killing innocent people. It does not make sense. Although background checks are only one part of the process,
in my opinion, we also need to look closely at how many guns we allow, how many
one individual needs to protect himself, and the reasons for allowing these
guns in the hands of almost anyone over the age of 21.
I would also just like to
point out that the NRA also supports guns for hunting purposes. This has nothing to do with second
amendment rights. It is a separate
topic and I wish that it would be kept separate. Period.
So when is it going to
change? What can we do? For starters, don’t make gun control a partisan
issue. Vote in legislators
who ‘get it’ that the world has changed since 1791 in oh-so-many ways, and we
need to keep up with those changes.
We seem to be keeping up technologically; why can’t we keep up with safety? It is not simple and won’t be done
overnight, but we need to do all we can to make our country safer, not only
from mass shootings, but from homicides too. As always, this is my two cents.
I don't need any of these to protect myself. What about you? |
I am in complete agreement! The only people in my opinion that should have assault weapons in their possession are military personnel and select police officers when they are working.
ReplyDeleteI am also appalled at the company we are keeping with the list of countries with greater gun death rates than the US. It is very depressing, upsetting and embarrassing!
Linda, excellent blog! I am not a gun person by any stretch of the imagination, and I don't hunt. As much as I'd like to think stricter gun control would help, I honestly don't think it'll matter. As long as assault rifles are being manufactured, those that want to acquire one will be able to. It won't matter if it's legal or not. Drugs are illegal, yet still readily available to anyone that wants to purchase them. Sadly, it's no different with guns. What we really need is people control, not gun control. The animals (all animals, sane or insane) that commit these unthinkable acts could care less whether purchasing a gun is legal or not. They are not of right mind. What happened in Aurora makes me sick. There are a lot of things in this world that make me sick. Yes, gun control makes it more difficult to purchase firearms, but it will never prevent it from happening. Let's be honest, if something's not legal and you want it, you can get it. You can enact all the laws and restrictions you want, but until you can remove the human (or more appropriately, inhuman) element from the equation, things will never change....and that makes me very angry, and very, very sad.
ReplyDelete....just my two cents!
I don't own a gun nor would I. At this point though, the cow is out of the barn, so to speak (100s of millions of guns out there).
ReplyDeleteI do have a "gun nut" friend who pointed out that all the countries that have dictatorships, it is because guns are forbidden. An army can have a heavy footprint unless others are shooting back. With the 1%ers and sense of entitlement the gov't has, I'd almost consider owning one. Except I doubt I could shoot someone even if they "deserved" it.
I have to believe that putting bans on assault weapons and providing better background checks would at least help keep some guns out of some bad hands. Yes, the 'gun is out of the bag', or the 'cow out of the barn', and there will always be those who do illegal and immoral things, but we have to do something even if it only helps a little. We can't just say, oh that is how it is, and do nothing. Of course if anyone has any ideas on how to do something that would help A LOT, please let us and your senators know...Thanks for weighing in...
ReplyDelete"The NRA has fought tooth and nail not to allow thorough proper background checks on people wanting to buy a gun. Why?"
DeleteI have your answer, and its a depressing one. Large corporations like the NRA make a good deal of their money from weapons manufacturing and sales. When it comes down to it, corporations are businesses, and businesses are driven by the bottom line.. money. Laws that put more weapons in more hands are profitable and ensure the corporations continuing growth, which is what investers want to see. When it comes down to it, the big time investers and players in the NRA, or any corporation want to see good results on their quarterly review. So they invest their money in lobbying for politicians who will ensure that their "interests" are secure. It's a system they've got worked out that can't be undone, unless an ethically responsible group of multi-billion dollar names step in, which frankly won't happen, because to get that kind of money, you have to be a business man, not a selfless soldier of justice. So what can we do? Well it just so happens that the NRA and their allied corporations and politicians have their hands in a lot mkre business than just guns. They're involved with oil, cars, plastics, clothes, food products, and anything under the sun that sells. Their only weakness? If we as consumers wake up from our morally sloth-lime daze and start to truly research what we are purchasing and who our dollars are going to, we can shape what survives in the market and what does not!! This is something ive began doing, and I'm astounded at how many of my favourite brands are funding arms dealers. Brands and big names weve come to trust have pulled the wool over our eyes. It's time we some up and did something about it. Smart and ethically responsible consumership is the answer.
Dear Anonymous,
DeleteYou are right...it IS depressing! Can you share the research you did about companies who are funding arms dealers? Thanks for weighing in.
Well I guess I'll be the contrarian this time. Yes my husband and I own a few guns, and a rifle. We both learned how to use them. Though I hope I'm never in a position where I may need to shoot someone.
DeleteI do however, agree with your position on assult rifles.I strongly disagree with the NRA on this one.
I also agree with doing background checks. Though nothing is 100%.
The only thing a ban on guns will do is increase the black market.
Even our own government is responsible for some of the violence with the drug cartel. Remember
Fast and Furious? One of our own border patrol personnel was killed due to this ill conceived idea.
There is no easy answer to avoid this type of violence which occurred in Auroa. From news reports I understand that the shooter mailed a notebook to a physchiatrist, which described his plan. Unfortunately this mail was not opened until after the shooting. Apparently the shooter had also written a paper regarding psychosis and the brain.
Since I live close to where the shooter grew up. I know he lived in a family oriented town with great schools.
My heart goes out to the families involved. In my opinion the best way to avoid another incident is be aware of the people around you. If you know someone who is troubled seek help.
Yes, please share the research on the companies funding arms dealers, that would be a place where we could have an impact. This whole situation makes me physically sick...
ReplyDeleteI just read this sane and reasoned article. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/26/opinion/armed-but-not-so-safe.html?_r=1&smid=fb-share
ReplyDeleteA 21 year old was shot in an apartment building in Montclare, NJ this week. This 21 year old lived in our town and graduated high school with my son. They just made an arrest of another 21 year old who shot him during a robbery. The suspect is charged with murder, robbery, and weapons offenses... Why does he have a gun? Clearly not for hunting, target shooting practice, or to protect himself from harm of others. He had a gun to make his robberies easier for him. I would be curious to know what background checks he went through and if he got the gun illegally, then what are we, as a society, going to do to work on obtaining guns illegally?
ReplyDelete